Follow up to TSA Response - Airline Management cannot request TSA to search bags on thier behalf...
I decided to do one more attempt to see if airline management can request TSA or any immigration/ag. officer to do a search on their behalf.
The answer is NO!!! (as you can see from the responses below).
So if you hear or find out that TSA is searching bags to look for items taken off the plane or by request of airline management, they are violating their own rules. If the TSA agent makes a comment in regards to bag search on behalf of the airline, dont put up a fight but request the TSA agent's name and the supervisor on duty. Report it via the TSA website and call your local AFA office. As your own personal choice, you might look into personal legal advise.
However, London and Frankfurt are a totally different story... Crews are getting searched left and right! So be aware. And those security agents have the direct lines to supervisors' cell phone numbers which they get called right away when a suspicious item is found on a crew member's bag. But that is a deal that AFA in FRA and LHR need to look into.
Take care and Happy Holidays!!!
Raul
From: XYZ
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 2:56 PM
To: Hornbach, Barbara
Cc: GotFeedback; SALGADO, PATRICK
Subject: Re: Got Feedback : Chicago-O'Hare Int'l Airport (ORD)
Ms. Hornbach:
Thank you so much for your reply and I do appreciate your time.
The issue we have, as Flight Attendants and crew members, is that we need to know, for once and for all, if a TSA Officer, a US Customs & Boarder Protection Officer, or a CBP Agricultural Specialist has the right to be asked by an Airline Management to do bag and personal searches on their behalf.
I don’t think that qualifies as a “sensitive/security” information. It should be a straight yes or no answer.
If you cannot answer that question, who should I speak to.
Thank you so much and I do hope to get an answer from you soon,
Raul
Mr. Zambrana:
I can only speak for TSA but I assume CBP works in the same way. Our Officers will not search a bag based solely on the request of a non-TSA employee. Officers will assess the situation and determine for themselves whether a bag search is required or not.
Regards,
Barbara Hornbach
Barbara H. Hornbach
Customer Service Quality Improvement Manager
Transportation Security Administration
Chicago O'Hare International Airport
Tel: (773) 377-1217
Cell: (773) 343-1772
Email: barbara.hornbach@dhs.gov
Yes, we work the same way. If feel we need to ask questions or search bags, we can do it with our Border Search Authority.
Thank you,
Patrick Salgado
Passenger Service Manager
United States Customs and Border Protection
O'Hare International Airport
Chicago, Illinois 60666
773-894-2900 Ext. 2872
312-296-6528-Blackberry
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Read this!!! Interesting!!! I received an email from an ORD based flight attendant with the story below. And for those of you who know me, you know I need to follow-up when I see an injustice. So I went ahead and shot an email to TSA... and read the story below. The emails are set in chronological order. If anyone has any input, please send me a message. Thanks!
From an Chicago based UA Flight Attendant: (Dec.05)
I got pulled today at O'hare customs. The customs agent asked me specifically if I took anything from the plane and if I bought anything from the crew or purser (thought that was a weird question). He said they were doing random crew searches because of reports of crew stealing from the airplane. I am going to contact the union and find out if united is once again trying to get around proper bag searches by having customs search us.
By the way, just talked to the union. Customs Agents are reporting crews and you need to get the Customs Agent(s) badge numbers and names if this happens to you!
My questions are:
1. Why would TSA help United this way? Any benefits for TSA?
2. Does UA has the authority to ask TSA to do searches on their behalf?
3. What are TSA proper procedures when searching crew bags?
I guess this is a story what will continue to develop....
Then, I decided to send this email via the TSA website feedback section:
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 7:31 AM
To: Hornbach, Barbara
Subject: Got Feedback : Chicago-O'Hare Int'l Airport (ORD)
Current Date/Time: 12/13/2008 8:31:47 AM
Airport: Chicago-O'Hare Int'l Airport (ORD)
Date/Time of Travel: 12/5/2008
Airline & Flight Number: United
Checkpoint/Area of Airport: O'Hare Immigrations at Terminal 5
TSA Employee: (If Known):
Compliment/Complaint:
One of the crew members of a United flight got pulled to a secondary check at O'Hare customs. The TSA agent asked the crew member, specifically, if s/he took anything from the plane.
The TSA agent also asked if the crew member if she "bought anything from the crew or purser" (thought that was a weird question).
The TSA agent said they were doing random crew searches because of reports of crew stealing from United airplanes.
I would like TSA to answer the following questions:
1. What are TSA proper procedures when searching crew bags? Anywhere crew members can read or access these procedures?
2. Does any airline management has the authority to ask TSA to do bag searches on their behalf? If so, what is the procedure?
3. If an airline management member asks TSA to do bag searches on their behalf, is this public information that can be look at? if so, how?
4. If these are not the proper procedures, what are the resources the crew member has to report the TSA agent who does an improper bag search?
5. Lastly, what is considered an improper bag search?
Thank you very much and any help you can send, (i.e. online resources or regulations available) will be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Would you like a response?: Yes
Passenger’s Name: XXXX
Phone Number: XXXX
Email: XXXX
-----Original Message-----
From: Hornbach, Barbara
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:36 AM
To: XXXX
Cc: Hornbach, Barbara; GotFeedback; SALGADO, PATRICK
Subject: RE: Got Feedback : Chicago-O'Hare Int'l Airport (ORD)
Mr. XYZ:
I am forwarding your Got Feedback email to Customs & Border Patrol for their consideration.
Regards,
Barbara Hornbach
Barbara H. Hornbach
Customer Service Quality Improvement Manager
Transportation Security Administration
Chicago O'Hare International Airport
Tel: (773) 377-1217
Cell: (773) 343-1772
Email: barbara.hornbach@dhs.gov
Sent: December 17, 2008
Mr. XYZ:
We discussed this Got Feedback email that you sent us. First of all, if a crew member has a complaint, he/she needs to contact us directly with the following information:
- Name
- Date/time
- Exact airline/flight number
- Inbound/outbound
- Is the issue with a TSA Officer, a US Customs & Boarder Protection Officer, or a CBP Agricultural Specialist? These are distinct positions and in the case of TSA and CBP different agencies.
Moreover, the answers to the questions you have asked are sensitive security information and cannot provided you. In addition, owing to the Privacy Act of 1974 we not at liberty to investigate the incident or release any information on the individual who prompted your inquiry.
We will be glad to direct the individual impacted to the proper authorities when we hear from him/her.
With kind regards,
Barbara Hornbach
Barbara H. Hornbach
Customer Service Quality Improvement Manager
Transportation Security Administration
Chicago O'Hare International Airport
Tel: (773) 377-1217
Cell: (773) 343-1772
Email: barbara.hornbach@dhs.gov
-------------------
Then, I replied on December 17th:
Ms. Hornbach:
Thank you so much for your reply and I do appreciate your time.
The issue we have, as Flight Attendants and crew members, is that we need to know, for once and for all, if a TSA Officer, a US Customs & Boarder Protection Officer, or a CBP Agricultural Specialist has the right to be asked by an Airline Management to do bag and personal searches on their behalf.
I don’t think that qualifies as a “sensitive/security” information. It should be a straight yes or no answer.
If you cannot answer that question, who should I speak to.
Thank you so much and I do hope to get an answer from you soon,
Raul
Monday, December 15, 2008
MY REVIEW -- DENVER MARRIOTT CITY CENTER HOTEL
1701 California St.
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 297-1300
It has been at least 5 years since I've stayed here. The hotel has not changed a bit, with clean and good facilities.
Check-in areas is quite small but nicely designed, with no counters but more like standing stations, which makes the interaction between Front Desk personnel and the guests more personal. There is a Starbucks Coffee counter located in the lobby and below, in the basement, there is a full bar as well as a restaurant. The check-in process was fast, yet friendly. Newspapers, a guide to Denver as well as coupons for a free drink at Rock Bottoms Bar (review available) are available at the Concierge's Desk.
The rooms are quite nice, comfortable and clean. The décor is quite good with a reading chair, desk, coffee maker and regular amenities such as Bath and Body Works shampoo, conditioner, soap and body lotion. The bed, typical of the Marriott chain, is quite good and comfortable. Our view was the office building across the mall (just a few feet away from the hotel). We did not have much of sunlight to start with. In addition, we had to keep the curtains closed most of the time for privacy, which made the room even darker.
Television is LG digital with great clear HD pictures and a good selection of channels. However, the television is very low in the entertainment unit, which makes it very hard to watch if you are laying down in the bed or seated in the reading chair at the end of the room. The Management of this hotel should order the engineers to move the television to the top of the entertainment unit and/or hang in the wall, where it will be much easier to watch.
And for those of you who follow my reviews (or become a 'follower' today), do know that I hate when wireless is charged when most business or upper class hotels offer this amenity for free. A $9.95 charge is quite ridiculous.
The fitness facilities are quite nice with plenty of treadmills and life cycle machines in the "inside" portion of the gym. Most of the machines do have televisions and even a docking station for your Ipod. If you do have a movie or video on the Ipod, you can watch it on the machine's television screen. However, I did follow the instructions to use mine and it did not connect.
The weight lifting machines are located in the pool "outside" area so be weary of children running and splashing water while you are trying to get a workout. The pool is quite small to do any kind of laps; seems to be more for show. There is a whirlpool and unisex steam-room and sauna located in this area. Professional massages are available as well as showers and a dressing room area.
The checkout process was done via the television access so we did not have to deal with the front desk. The entire bill is available for you to see, check all the charges and, if there are no discrepancies, the bill is charged to your credit card and mailed to the address provided when checked-in.
We had a rental car and the cost of valet parking is $27.00. However, the cost of park yourself is $20.00. Think of the $7.00 as a convenience charge. Or go down a few blocks to another cheaper parking garage.
Final Verdict:
Location: 5.0 out of 5.0
Lobby/Reception Area: 4.0 out of 5.0
Staff friendliness/responsiveness: 4.5 / 5.0
Room Decor/Ambiance: 4.5 / 5.0
Room cleanliness: 5.0 / 5.0
Room Amenities: 4.5 / 5.0
Bed Comfort: 5.0 / 5.0
Check-in/out Speed: 5.0 out of 5.0
Room Price Value: 3.5 out of 5.0
Total Score: 41 / 45 ( 91 out of 100% or A Grade)
Final Comment: A nice hotel just a block away from the 16th Street Mall. Clean, well-decorated and comfortable beds make the room quite nice, as it is expected from a Marriott Hotel. Nice facilities, amenities and friendly staff. Just take quite a few points for television being too low and wireless charges... argh!
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 297-1300
It has been at least 5 years since I've stayed here. The hotel has not changed a bit, with clean and good facilities.
Check-in areas is quite small but nicely designed, with no counters but more like standing stations, which makes the interaction between Front Desk personnel and the guests more personal. There is a Starbucks Coffee counter located in the lobby and below, in the basement, there is a full bar as well as a restaurant. The check-in process was fast, yet friendly. Newspapers, a guide to Denver as well as coupons for a free drink at Rock Bottoms Bar (review available) are available at the Concierge's Desk.
The rooms are quite nice, comfortable and clean. The décor is quite good with a reading chair, desk, coffee maker and regular amenities such as Bath and Body Works shampoo, conditioner, soap and body lotion. The bed, typical of the Marriott chain, is quite good and comfortable. Our view was the office building across the mall (just a few feet away from the hotel). We did not have much of sunlight to start with. In addition, we had to keep the curtains closed most of the time for privacy, which made the room even darker.
Television is LG digital with great clear HD pictures and a good selection of channels. However, the television is very low in the entertainment unit, which makes it very hard to watch if you are laying down in the bed or seated in the reading chair at the end of the room. The Management of this hotel should order the engineers to move the television to the top of the entertainment unit and/or hang in the wall, where it will be much easier to watch.
And for those of you who follow my reviews (or become a 'follower' today), do know that I hate when wireless is charged when most business or upper class hotels offer this amenity for free. A $9.95 charge is quite ridiculous.
The fitness facilities are quite nice with plenty of treadmills and life cycle machines in the "inside" portion of the gym. Most of the machines do have televisions and even a docking station for your Ipod. If you do have a movie or video on the Ipod, you can watch it on the machine's television screen. However, I did follow the instructions to use mine and it did not connect.
The weight lifting machines are located in the pool "outside" area so be weary of children running and splashing water while you are trying to get a workout. The pool is quite small to do any kind of laps; seems to be more for show. There is a whirlpool and unisex steam-room and sauna located in this area. Professional massages are available as well as showers and a dressing room area.
The checkout process was done via the television access so we did not have to deal with the front desk. The entire bill is available for you to see, check all the charges and, if there are no discrepancies, the bill is charged to your credit card and mailed to the address provided when checked-in.
We had a rental car and the cost of valet parking is $27.00. However, the cost of park yourself is $20.00. Think of the $7.00 as a convenience charge. Or go down a few blocks to another cheaper parking garage.
Final Verdict:
Location: 5.0 out of 5.0
Lobby/Reception Area: 4.0 out of 5.0
Staff friendliness/responsiveness: 4.5 / 5.0
Room Decor/Ambiance: 4.5 / 5.0
Room cleanliness: 5.0 / 5.0
Room Amenities: 4.5 / 5.0
Bed Comfort: 5.0 / 5.0
Check-in/out Speed: 5.0 out of 5.0
Room Price Value: 3.5 out of 5.0
Total Score: 41 / 45 ( 91 out of 100% or A Grade)
Final Comment: A nice hotel just a block away from the 16th Street Mall. Clean, well-decorated and comfortable beds make the room quite nice, as it is expected from a Marriott Hotel. Nice facilities, amenities and friendly staff. Just take quite a few points for television being too low and wireless charges... argh!
Sunday, December 14, 2008
HARVEY MILK, PROPOSITION 8 AND A FRIENDSHIP LOST
On December 5th, I was reading "The New York Times" online and came across and article about a video posted in the Funny Or Die website called: "Prop 8 -- The Musical". At that point the video had received more than 1.2 million hits. The comedic song-and-dance diatribe about the California ballot initiative to define marriage as existing only between a man and a woman stars a cast of dozens, including John C. Reilly, Neil Patrick Harris, Maya Rudolph, and Jack Black as Jesus Christ.
If you watch the video, you will laugh your pants off... as much as I did. I decided to send the link to my friends so they could enjoy it as much as I did.
One of my friends decided to send me a reply which I will share with you in a moment. From what I gather, I guess she did not like the video much... but we will get back to that in a second...
Today, December 14th, I went to see the movie "Milk" with Sean Penn. Some people might say it is a "gay" movie or issue. The fact is that it is none of that. It does deal with the essentials of our basic rights as human beings and as American citizens. The movie characters constantly remind you, in their own ways and by Harvey Milk, that this is an issue where we are all equal citizens and should be treated as such by the Constitution and the basic rights of our Government. Finally, it does deal with the issue of religion and how it does constantly invades the basic right of "separation of church and state". I do recommend everyone to see this movie as it will strike a cord deep inside of you that will move you to be more understanding of everyone as people and not as a group, ethnic, religious group or stereotype. In my own words, this movie is just "perfection" and I do hope it wins as many awards as possible. Hopefully, by doing so, it will bring attention to equality for everyone.
If you do take this movie and change the names and situation to the current issues facing California over "Proposition 8" (marriage rights for all citizens), it its almost like story is repeating itself.
If you watch the video, you will laugh your pants off... as much as I did. I decided to send the link to my friends so they could enjoy it as much as I did.
One of my friends decided to send me a reply which I will share with you in a moment. From what I gather, I guess she did not like the video much... but we will get back to that in a second...
Today, December 14th, I went to see the movie "Milk" with Sean Penn. Some people might say it is a "gay" movie or issue. The fact is that it is none of that. It does deal with the essentials of our basic rights as human beings and as American citizens. The movie characters constantly remind you, in their own ways and by Harvey Milk, that this is an issue where we are all equal citizens and should be treated as such by the Constitution and the basic rights of our Government. Finally, it does deal with the issue of religion and how it does constantly invades the basic right of "separation of church and state". I do recommend everyone to see this movie as it will strike a cord deep inside of you that will move you to be more understanding of everyone as people and not as a group, ethnic, religious group or stereotype. In my own words, this movie is just "perfection" and I do hope it wins as many awards as possible. Hopefully, by doing so, it will bring attention to equality for everyone.
If you do take this movie and change the names and situation to the current issues facing California over "Proposition 8" (marriage rights for all citizens), it its almost like story is repeating itself.
Proposition 6, which is a central plot point of the movie "Milk", was an initiative on the California State ballot on November 7th 1978,and was more commonly known as The Briggs Initiative. Sponsored by John Briggs, a conservative state legislator from Orange County, the failed initiative would have banned gays and lesbians, and possibly anyone who supported gay rights, from working in California's public schools. The Briggs Initiative was the first failure in a conservative movement that started with the successful campaign headed by Anita Bryant and her organization "Save our Children" in Dade County, Florida to repeal a local gay rights ordinance. The movie also deals with the different state initiatives where local state constitutions have added ammendments to ban same-sex civil unions or marriages.
On today's California issue of Proposition 8, the religious far right (i.e. the Mormon and Catholic Church) decided to take the lead on this proposition and be the guiding light of the movement. Mormons? The ones that say a man can marry as many women as he wants (is that the basic sanctity of marriage?) or the Catholics (children sexual predators?) but I digress... There is a lot to be said about Proposition 8 as to background information and other current issues. I do suggest reading Wikipedia's Proposition 8 section to truly understand the current issues at hand.
The movie does a great job at combining real footage with acted ones. I do highly recommend watching the documentary "The Life and Times of Harvey Milk" (circa 1982) where you will be able to see the actual footage and interviews with those personally involved with the story, such as the Harvey's campaign manager and friends . And in the movie, three of the characters are played by the actual people involved.
Now, lets go back to my so-called friend...
After I sent the video link of the "Prop.8-The Musical" to my friends, I got a nasty reply from Lori Mercil, a person who was my roomate while living in Germany and working as flight attendants. Here is her reply:
"Hey Raul, The US has a democratic system and the people of CA have spoken. How intolerant of you and the angry gay movement to be shove your ways into people's faces, take crosses and stomp on them and batter little old ladies ect.... because they do not believe the same way as you. Shame on you!!!! I find the people who scream intolerance, are the very ones who are the biggest INTOLERANT people!! Lori"
I was shocked and hurt by her choice of words. After much thinking, I decided to reply to her and here is my response:
"Lori,
Don’t take it so personal... It was a joke...
I guess “Christianity” took the best of you...
Sorry to see that you cannot take a joke, enjoy it and if you don’t like it, just don’t pay attention to it.
Also, I say to you, that tolerance is taught by all religions and seems that, whatever religion, cult or group you are following, does not teach that.
As a woman, my dear Lori, you need to understand that it was not until 1920 that women fought to change the Constitution of the United States and were allowed to vote.
In addition, as recent as 1965, blacks had restricted civil rights and civil liberties. State-sponsored school segregation was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1954 in Brown vs. Board of Education. Generally, the remaining laws that prohibited blacks from having equal rights were overruled by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Furthermore, Lori, the United States Bill of Rights States the following:
“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
As you can see, proposition 8 violates the entire bases of the USA Bill of Rights – which covers all the States of the Union and citizens.
See, my dear Lori, gays are fighting as hard as women and blacks did for many years to have equal rights... And that is what is happening in California today. The Constitution of the United States has been changed many times to create equality for everyone... Including women and blacks.
It will be a matter of time before people like me (who did not choose to be gay – regardless of what you might think – I didn’t choose to be this way) can have the same rights that you have.
Just look around the World...
Nations that recognize gay marriage:
Canada -- In June of 2005, the Canadian Parliament enacted a law allowing legal marriage for same-sex couples.
Belgium -- The second nation to legalize same-sex marriage in 2003.
Netherlands -- The first country to grant gay marriage in 2001.
Norway -- Became the sixth country to legalize same-sex marriage on May 11, 2008.
South Africa -- South Africa became the fifth nation to recognize gay marriage in 2005.
Spain -- Spain became the fourth nation to allow gay marriage on June 29, 2005.
And the list keeps getting longer and better...
Nations that allow same-sex partnerships or unions:
Brazil -- the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul currently allows same-sex civil unions (June 2006).
Croatia -- Civil partnerships for same-sex couples have been granted since 2003.
Denmark -- Legal civil partnerships have been allowed since 1989.
Finland -- Has offered registered partnership benefits since September 2001.
France -- Pacte Civil de Solidarité” (PACS), or “Civil Solidarity Pacts,” were instituted in France on November 9, 1999.
Germany -- Gay couples can register as "Life Partnerships," granting lesser financial and pension benefits than marriage.
Hungary -- Gay couples have been protected under common-law marriages since 1995; however they are not eligible for legal marriage.
Iceland -- Since 1996, gay Icelanders have been protected under registered partnerships.
Luxembourg -- Civil partnership legislation modeled after France's PACS were introduced in Luxembourg in 2004.
Mexico -- Same sex civil unions were legalized in Mexico City in November 2006 and in the state of Coahuila on January of 2007, essentially making civil unions legal in all of Mexico (by law, each Mexican state must recognize the laws granted to individuals of the other states).
New Zealand -- In December, 2004, New Zealand enacted legislation recognizing same-sex civil unions.
Norway -- Since 1996, gay Norwegians have been protected under registered partnerships.
Portugal -- Same-sex partners have the same rights as opposite-sex partners in common law marriage.
Sweden -- Swedish same-sex couples have been able to register under domestic partnership laws since 1995.
Switzerland -- Same-sex couples are given limited legal benefits with civil recognition.
United Kingdom -- Domestic partners can register under the Civil Partnership Act. This legislation took affect in December 5, 2005 giving registered same-sex couples all of the rights, privileges and responsibilities of married heterosexual couples. The Civil Partnership Act applies across all of England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.
In the United States:
US States that allow same-sex partnerships or unions:
Connecticut -- Although Connecticut defines marriage as between a man and woman, it became the second U.S. state to grant same-sex civil unions in April, 2005.
New Hampshire -- New Hampshire, home of the Episcopal Church's first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson, became the 4th state behind Vermont, New Jersey and Connecticut to offer civil unions. Same-sex partners were allowed to register for civil unions in January 2008. More on New Hampshire Civil Unions
Oregon -- Under Oregon's new domestic partnership law gay and lesbian couples are eligible for all the state-wide rights and benefits of marriage. Oregon also outlaws discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Vermont -- The first U.S. state to offer same-sex civil unions in 2000. Learn about Vermont civil unions.
Washington -- On April 21, 2007, Washington's domestic partnership bill was signed into law giving gay and lesbian couples many of the benefits of marriage.
US states that recognize gay marriage:
Connecticut -- In a 4 to 3 decision, the Connecticut Supreme Court overturned the state's ban on same-sex marriage, making it the third state to allow legal gay marriage.
New Jersey -- New Jersey is the third U.S. state to offer same-sex civil unions behind Vermont and Connecticut. The new same-sex civil unions law, which goes into affect on February 19, 2007, grants gay and lesbian couples the same rights as marriage. *(Although same-sex unions in New Jersey are classified as civil unions, couples are granted the same rights as married heterosexual couples.)
New York -- By a May 29, 2008 directive, New York only recognizes gay marriages from couples legally married outside of the state. read more
Massachusetts -- On May 17, 2004 Massachusetts became the first U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage. The State of Massachusetts also issues licenses to gay couples from New Mexico and Rhode Island since neither state explicitly prohibits same-sex marriage.
Even though Don and I have been together for almost 12 years (more than most ‘straight’ couples will ever be together), we cannot file taxes together, have the same rights to visitation in a hospital or intensive care unit (God forbids!) or even access to joint finances and insurance... And even in most states, adopt a child in need.
The day will come were everyone, regardless of sexual orientation, will have the same rights... Not in the next few years, but it will come and I can’t wait for that day!
We have been through this “intolerant and narrow-minded” personality of yours before... You have major issues of not understanding and respecting others (remember the argument you had with Khaldoun in the apartment in Frankfurt because you could not open your mind to understand his religion – believing that yours is the only “right” one and tried to impose it on him and me?)
Lastly, Lori, go ahead and delete me from all of your address books, emails, facebook, etc... I don’t want to be friends or even have any contact with people that are narrow-minded, intolerant and cannot open their hearts and minds to equality, liberty and tolerance for all.
Take care and I do hope you have a good-fulfilling life.
Raul Zambrana"
I would like to see people that think like Lori to see this movie. It will show and make everyone understand that it is a basic human rights issue where we should treat everyone equally and respect.
That's my 2 cents for the day...
Saturday, December 13, 2008
MY REVIEW OF THE MOLLY BROWN HOUSE MUSEUM - DENVER, CO.
Molly Brown House Museum
1340 Pennsylvania St.Denver, CO 80203
(303) 832-4092
First of all, if you do not know who's Ms. Brown, think of the movie "Titanic" with Leonardo di Caprio and Kate Winslet. Then, think of Kathy Bates in the movie... ah! Bingo! That is Molly Brown... Also known as the "Unsinkable" Ms. Brown.
The first thing you learn about her even before you enter the museum...
Her actual name is Margaret Brown, not Molly Brown as Hollywood portrays her in the movies or plays. She never went by Molly... ever... it was either Margaret or Ms. Brown.So then, why the name "Molly"? It was given to her when making the musical and movies as the name "Margaret" did not rhyme well... yeap! The Hollywood machine changed someone's entire personality for the sake of movie and music making...
Without giving too much of the tour away, here is how Ms. Brown ended being one of the few survivors of Titanic:
With her children grown and separated from her husband, Ms. Brown, who knew more than 5 languages and traveled all over the world, was in Egypt when she received a message that her only grandchild was gravely ill. As fast as she could, she made it to London. The next available cruise to the United States was the Titanic. Ms. Brown bought a first class ticket and off she went... to become one of Titanic's most famous survivor.
By the way, did you know that she refused to get on a lifeboat? She was helping the crew of Titanic organize people to get in the lifeboats, passing all of her mink coats to other people to keep warm. It was two of Titanic's crew-members who literally grabbed her off her feet and, as lifeboat #6 was being lowered into the water, they threw her into the lifeboat, a few feet down, where she could not make her way back into the Titanic. She was willing to die while helping others... the kind of woman she was! If that would have happened, we would not have Ms. Brown or this museum today.
With her experience, she lobbied the US Congress and the Senate to make into law that every cruiseship must have a lifevest and a seat on a lifeboat for every single passenger onboard, regardless of class. The creation of this law is why, on your first day of a cruise, everyone must learn how to don their vests and where is the meeting point to board the lifeboats. This law also extends to airplanes and any mode of mass transportation. Wonder why you need to watch the safety video or the flight attendants showing you how to don your vest and/or how to use your seat cushion as a flotation device? Say thank you to Ms. Brown.
There is a lot more to be said about this fantastic woman who was a pioneer of women's rights, lobbied and created the bases for what we know today as the "Juvenile Court System" and fought for rights of miners and domestic workers, among many other accomplishments... but I will leave that to the Museum and tour guides.
The house, which was turned into apartments after Ms. Brown's passing, was bought by the State of Colorado for $80,000 in the early 90's. After much research, they found Ms. Brown's personal pictures of the house, which were used as the frame for what the place looks like today. In addition, researchers were able to order copies of the original carpeting designs and wallpapers. Most of the furniture, including the beds, piano, books, art and pictures among many others belonged to Ms. Brown .
When on the second floor, look at the list of items that Ms. Brown lost in the Titanic. The total loss was close to $30,000; with $20,000 of that on a necklace. Yikes!
The one-hour tour will teach you about her entire life story, accomplishments and lifestyle. The cost is $7.00. At the end, there is a movie you can watch at your leisure, interactive computer games and artifacts. The gift shop, where you will buy the tickets for the tour, is in the carriage house, located behind the main house.
One word of advise: Colorado Tourism Board needs to to a better job at adding signs to get to Molly Brown's House Museum. Even though there are plenty of signs on the 16th Street Mall leading you to the Civic Center, DAM and Capitol Square, there are no signs to guide you to the Museum. Hint, hint!!
Friday, December 12, 2008
PAL JOEY - MY REVIEW OF THE NEW BROADWAY SHOW
From the Pal Joey website: "Set in Chicago in the late 1930s, PAL JOEY is the story of Joey Evans, a brash, scheming song and dance man with dreams of owning his own nightclub. Joey abandons his wholesome girlfriend Linda English, to charm a rich, married older woman, Vera Simpson, in the hope that she'll set him up in business."
This is a revival from the 1940's show originally played by Gene Kelly. Currently in previews, the official opening night is December 11th. It is a limited engagement run until February 15, 2009 at the old Studio 54.
When I got to the theater and took a seat, I felt quite a vibration underneath me. The theater is located above one of new York's subway lines and every few minutes you do feel your chair rattle a little... For the Broadway fans, we do know for a fact that most theaters' leg room can be rather small, squeezing the rows closer and closer to get more chairs in. However, I do have to say, I was rather surprise with the leg room of the theater. I could actually stretch out quite a distance and did not have the usual leg cramps by the time the show was over.
The set design, done by Scott Pask, is quite nice. The background set is a street in Chicago's Loop with an elevated "L" train track. The stage changes are well done; going from a bar, to an apartment to a diner, to a street... Staging floors move on both sides of the stage as well as from the back to the center-front of the stage, and the usual drops from the ceiling. Mr. Pask did capture the 1930's furniture and design brilliantly.
The costume design is absolutely fantastic. Done by William Ivey Long, the suits, dresses and dancers costumes are just beautiful, specially the dresses worn by Vera Simpson (Stockard Channing), with a lot of spark and well (some very tight) fittings.
However, here is why I gave it a 3-star...
For the first few minutes of the show, Joey Evans, played by ex-Jersey Boy Christian Hoff, dances around in what it seems an eternity without signing a single lyric... It did seem a little silly and did not help set the show very well. It might have worked well for Gene Kelly, but did not for Mr. Hoff. Sadly, at some points it did seems that Mr.Hoff had two left feet. I don't think dancing is one of his strengths.
And then, when he started singing, I don't know if there was a problem with his voice, but it was cracking, out of tune and could not sing as well as it is expected from a Tony winner. His acting skills were his saving grace; carrying the character of the ambitious Joey Evans well though the entire show.
Stockard Channing, as expected, shines excellently in her acting of the rich, manipulating and clever Vera Simpson. I do have to giver her major credit for going up and down circular and narrow stairs that run from the top to the bottom of the stage in high heels and tight dresses. However, her singing, not as bad as Christian Hoff, could have used a little bit more training and warm-up as well.
The real star of the show is Martha Plimpton. She does an amazing job in the role of the aging night club singer Glady Bumps. Ms. Plimpton should be the one who gets credit for carrying the plot and story line all the way through. You feel her emotions, ranging from hate to distress to anguish. Ms. Plimpton's acting should get her a Tony nomination, at least.
The support cast is very good as well. Jenny Fellner, who plays Linda English, has an important role on the show as she is the cathartic character who bring Pal Joey to his senses. Robert Clohessy, in the role of Mike, has to deal with balancing two roles in his life: a tough manager of a successful night club while hiding his homosexuality to the world; a taboo subject for an original 1940's show.
The dancers are fantastic with what it seems non-stop and back-to-back dance numbers, specially in the first part of the show. (I always wonder how they get in and out of clothes that quickly!)
I do have to give credit to the director, Joe Mantello, for doing a great revival of Pal Joey. All of the elements came brilliantly together and the hard work of his entire team shines through the whole show. I just wished it was better singing from the lead actors... there is time to be fixed before the "official" opening night.
UPDATE!!! -- From "The New York Times" entertainment section - Nov.24, 2008:
"Christian Hoff has withdrawn from the coming Broadway revival of Rodgers and Hart's "Pal Joey" and has been replaced by his understudy, Matthew Risch, the show's producers announced Monday.
Mr. Hoff, who starred in "Jersey Boys," injured his foot during a Friday night preview performance, the producers said; Mr. Risch took over the role for the remaining weekend performances. The character of Joey Evans, previously played onstage by Gene Kelly and on film by Frank Sinatra, had been expected to be a breakthrough role for Mr. Hoff.
The show's opening night at Studio 54 has been postponed by one week to Dec. 18."
This is a revival from the 1940's show originally played by Gene Kelly. Currently in previews, the official opening night is December 11th. It is a limited engagement run until February 15, 2009 at the old Studio 54.
When I got to the theater and took a seat, I felt quite a vibration underneath me. The theater is located above one of new York's subway lines and every few minutes you do feel your chair rattle a little... For the Broadway fans, we do know for a fact that most theaters' leg room can be rather small, squeezing the rows closer and closer to get more chairs in. However, I do have to say, I was rather surprise with the leg room of the theater. I could actually stretch out quite a distance and did not have the usual leg cramps by the time the show was over.
The set design, done by Scott Pask, is quite nice. The background set is a street in Chicago's Loop with an elevated "L" train track. The stage changes are well done; going from a bar, to an apartment to a diner, to a street... Staging floors move on both sides of the stage as well as from the back to the center-front of the stage, and the usual drops from the ceiling. Mr. Pask did capture the 1930's furniture and design brilliantly.
The costume design is absolutely fantastic. Done by William Ivey Long, the suits, dresses and dancers costumes are just beautiful, specially the dresses worn by Vera Simpson (Stockard Channing), with a lot of spark and well (some very tight) fittings.
However, here is why I gave it a 3-star...
For the first few minutes of the show, Joey Evans, played by ex-Jersey Boy Christian Hoff, dances around in what it seems an eternity without signing a single lyric... It did seem a little silly and did not help set the show very well. It might have worked well for Gene Kelly, but did not for Mr. Hoff. Sadly, at some points it did seems that Mr.Hoff had two left feet. I don't think dancing is one of his strengths.
And then, when he started singing, I don't know if there was a problem with his voice, but it was cracking, out of tune and could not sing as well as it is expected from a Tony winner. His acting skills were his saving grace; carrying the character of the ambitious Joey Evans well though the entire show.
Stockard Channing, as expected, shines excellently in her acting of the rich, manipulating and clever Vera Simpson. I do have to giver her major credit for going up and down circular and narrow stairs that run from the top to the bottom of the stage in high heels and tight dresses. However, her singing, not as bad as Christian Hoff, could have used a little bit more training and warm-up as well.
The real star of the show is Martha Plimpton. She does an amazing job in the role of the aging night club singer Glady Bumps. Ms. Plimpton should be the one who gets credit for carrying the plot and story line all the way through. You feel her emotions, ranging from hate to distress to anguish. Ms. Plimpton's acting should get her a Tony nomination, at least.
The support cast is very good as well. Jenny Fellner, who plays Linda English, has an important role on the show as she is the cathartic character who bring Pal Joey to his senses. Robert Clohessy, in the role of Mike, has to deal with balancing two roles in his life: a tough manager of a successful night club while hiding his homosexuality to the world; a taboo subject for an original 1940's show.
The dancers are fantastic with what it seems non-stop and back-to-back dance numbers, specially in the first part of the show. (I always wonder how they get in and out of clothes that quickly!)
I do have to give credit to the director, Joe Mantello, for doing a great revival of Pal Joey. All of the elements came brilliantly together and the hard work of his entire team shines through the whole show. I just wished it was better singing from the lead actors... there is time to be fixed before the "official" opening night.
UPDATE!!! -- From "The New York Times" entertainment section - Nov.24, 2008:
"Christian Hoff has withdrawn from the coming Broadway revival of Rodgers and Hart's "Pal Joey" and has been replaced by his understudy, Matthew Risch, the show's producers announced Monday.
Mr. Hoff, who starred in "Jersey Boys," injured his foot during a Friday night preview performance, the producers said; Mr. Risch took over the role for the remaining weekend performances. The character of Joey Evans, previously played onstage by Gene Kelly and on film by Frank Sinatra, had been expected to be a breakthrough role for Mr. Hoff.
The show's opening night at Studio 54 has been postponed by one week to Dec. 18."
Thursday, December 11, 2008
REVIEW: JFK AIRPORT (NEW YORK) - TERMINAL 1
Terminal 1 is owned by a consortium of a handful airlines (Lufthansa, Air France, Korean and Japan Air). They rent gates to other carriers such as Aeroflot and Alitalia. However, due to the fact that Terminal 1 has only a handful of airlines operating out if this area, the gates are always open, plenty of room to move around and places to sit. Compared to the overused and cramped Terminal 4, this is heaven!
I took the AirTrain (review available) from Jamaica Station. I arrived at Terminal 1 at 7pm for my 9:45pm flight to Frankfurt, Germany. Of course, as a good passenger, I followed the airline's rule when I was told to be here 2 hours before my departure. The airline of choice for tonight's flight is Lufthansa. I went to the counter and there was no line. With no bags to check, the check-in process took no longer than 5 minutes. The TSA security line was completely empty. I moved to the front of the line, passed security and I am sitting in front of my gate at 7:20 writing this review... WOW! What to do with all of my free time...
So, I am looking for what to do and this is the only problem with this Terminal...
The food court is in the check-in area; before entering security. If you want to have a bite to eat before a red-eye flight (specially for those who want to sleep as soon as they plane takes off) they have to do it before entering the gate area. However, I rather make sure that I do not have the stress of thinking that I have to go through security. There are two Panini Express (one at each end of the terminal) but that's it. There is only one open bar, the Martini Bar, (there are two in total) at the end of the terminal.
Terminal 1 is full of over-priced stores such as Godiva, Bulgari, Cartier Duty Free and Hermes among many others. There are plenty of people browsing but not much buying... who can afford a $220 scarf? Not me! Rather wear my cheap but modern looking Old Navy one. However, I got sucked in by the bargains at Duty Free and got myself a bottle of wine and champagne-chocolate truffles! Yum, yum!!!
Wi-Fi is available but at a rather expensive price of $8.00 for one day. You can log in into the wireless system if you have T-mobile, Sprint or a handful of other accounts. But, since I do not have any of them, I would have to pay... which I am not!
I walked the entire length of the terminal and overall, is quite clean. The only problem is the bathrooms. From the moment that you walk right by them (not even inside) you get hit by the smell of urine. Inside is not any better. It did smell and looked quite disgusting. I tried to breathe a little as possible.
Terminal 1 is a good one to fly in and out of... but the fact that, once security is passed and inside the gate area, there is only 1 bar, not a restaurant in sight except for a quite expensive and cheap looking sandwich place, and many overpriced stores around. Remember that international passengers tend to show up quite early for their flights. Not to have place to eat or have a drink calmly, away from the boarding area, makes this terminal feel like a little bit of a trap.
But, for it saving grace, a handful of airlines that operate out of this airport, makes it spacious and a piece of heaven compared to the overused Terminal 4.
Bathrooms need to be given attention to and clean properly. Wireless should be free (like Denver and other major airports) to at least, give the passengers something to do while waiting for their flights.
I took the AirTrain (review available) from Jamaica Station. I arrived at Terminal 1 at 7pm for my 9:45pm flight to Frankfurt, Germany. Of course, as a good passenger, I followed the airline's rule when I was told to be here 2 hours before my departure. The airline of choice for tonight's flight is Lufthansa. I went to the counter and there was no line. With no bags to check, the check-in process took no longer than 5 minutes. The TSA security line was completely empty. I moved to the front of the line, passed security and I am sitting in front of my gate at 7:20 writing this review... WOW! What to do with all of my free time...
So, I am looking for what to do and this is the only problem with this Terminal...
The food court is in the check-in area; before entering security. If you want to have a bite to eat before a red-eye flight (specially for those who want to sleep as soon as they plane takes off) they have to do it before entering the gate area. However, I rather make sure that I do not have the stress of thinking that I have to go through security. There are two Panini Express (one at each end of the terminal) but that's it. There is only one open bar, the Martini Bar, (there are two in total) at the end of the terminal.
Terminal 1 is full of over-priced stores such as Godiva, Bulgari, Cartier Duty Free and Hermes among many others. There are plenty of people browsing but not much buying... who can afford a $220 scarf? Not me! Rather wear my cheap but modern looking Old Navy one. However, I got sucked in by the bargains at Duty Free and got myself a bottle of wine and champagne-chocolate truffles! Yum, yum!!!
Wi-Fi is available but at a rather expensive price of $8.00 for one day. You can log in into the wireless system if you have T-mobile, Sprint or a handful of other accounts. But, since I do not have any of them, I would have to pay... which I am not!
I walked the entire length of the terminal and overall, is quite clean. The only problem is the bathrooms. From the moment that you walk right by them (not even inside) you get hit by the smell of urine. Inside is not any better. It did smell and looked quite disgusting. I tried to breathe a little as possible.
Terminal 1 is a good one to fly in and out of... but the fact that, once security is passed and inside the gate area, there is only 1 bar, not a restaurant in sight except for a quite expensive and cheap looking sandwich place, and many overpriced stores around. Remember that international passengers tend to show up quite early for their flights. Not to have place to eat or have a drink calmly, away from the boarding area, makes this terminal feel like a little bit of a trap.
But, for it saving grace, a handful of airlines that operate out of this airport, makes it spacious and a piece of heaven compared to the overused Terminal 4.
Bathrooms need to be given attention to and clean properly. Wireless should be free (like Denver and other major airports) to at least, give the passengers something to do while waiting for their flights.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
